Bullshit. The point of using someone’s preferred pronouns is to demonstrate that you respect their identity and want them to feel safe around you. If you think grammatical correctness is more important than making other people feel accepted and safe, then you are an asshole.
From Anagnori's “A Non-Binary Person’s Guide to Invented Pronouns” (via unskinny)

(via sleepydumpling)

If you struggle with self-care and see this, stop what you’re doing

rosecoveredtardis:

  • Have you eaten in the last 4ish hours?
  • Have you had something to drink today?
  • Can you have something, even if just milk or water or cup’o’noodles or toast with something yummy on it, if you haven’t, please? 
  • If you have any injuries, can you please take care of them for me
  • Also please take any meds if you should and haven’t, yet?

Whatever you have or haven’t done today just know you’re super strong and I am so proud of you

Okay you can go back to blogging now~ <3

(via feelingswithbrandy)

hmasfatty:

holmesbody:

the-little-house-of-morons:

cearalucaya:

aquaticslime:

the-little-house-of-morons:

Ok so this is going to sound stupid as shit to most people but holy shit, when I see children/baby clothes I get so confused.  Beyond reasoning.   I even ask things like “why is doll clothes so expensive holy shit’ or “do children actually exist or is this clothing for gnomes?”  I don’t understand.  The tiny clothes, just… THE TINY CLOTHES.  LOOK.  IT’S A WAISTCOAT FOR A 1 YEAR OLD.  WHY IS THIS SO FUNNY TO ME.  It’S A TINy SuiT FOR BABIES.  WHY.
Don’t try to put logic into this.  I KNOW that formal wear is required for like.. weddings, church n shit.  but LOOK AT THE PHOTo.  LOOK AT THE TinY FULL OUTFIT.  IT”sSO FUNNY tO me.

they’re for lITTLE BABY BUSINESS PEOPLE OMFG

V begged for me to add these. I’m so sorry.
"susan, rechedule my 9 o’clock meeting. I just shit my pants."
"Johnny, find out what this peek-a-boo asshole wants. He keeps kidnapping my family and giving them back"
"JERRY. I JUST TOOK A NAP. AND I’M STILL TIRED OF YOUR SHIT."
"LOOK. JOHNSON. PULL THIS OFF, AND YOU’LL BE DRIVING A NEW POWER WHEELS BY NEXT WEEK."
"Don’t try to bullshit me Johnson, I wasn’t born yesterday. I was born four months ago."
"Man, you should see me secretary’s rack. Lunch for DAYS."
"Alright mark, let’s talk numbers. But keep in mine that I can only count to five."
"TELL IAN I’M NOT SIGNING THE AGREEMENT UNTIL HE GIVES ME MY NOSE BACK"
"SUSAN. I’M MEETING THE CEO AT THE AIRPORT. CALL FOR MY TRICYCLE"
"JOHNSON GET IN HERE. I CAN’T EAT THIS WITHOUT THE PLANE SOUND."
"WE NEED TO MEET OUR PUKE QUOTA"
"MOMMY ISN’T STRESSED ENOUGH AND WE’RE HITTING OUR DEADLINE"
"AIDEN. AIDEN. LISTEN TO ME. GIVE ME THE JUICE"
"CLARISEE YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND. I NEED THIS PACIFIER"
"DAMMIT JIMMY I NEED THAT PLAYDATE FOR TOMORROW’

I am
legit in fucking
tears
baby business people ahahahahah

hmasfatty
Yes. This is everything I love.

I need at least 5 of these for my little baby boy now. Got a proper laugh out of the jokes but the suits are so cute too.

hmasfatty:

holmesbody:

the-little-house-of-morons:

cearalucaya:

aquaticslime:

the-little-house-of-morons:

Ok so this is going to sound stupid as shit to most people but holy shit, when I see children/baby clothes I get so confused.  Beyond reasoning.   I even ask things like “why is doll clothes so expensive holy shit’ or “do children actually exist or is this clothing for gnomes?”  I don’t understand.  The tiny clothes, just… THE TINY CLOTHES.  LOOK.  IT’S A WAISTCOAT FOR A 1 YEAR OLD.  WHY IS THIS SO FUNNY TO ME.  It’S A TINy SuiT FOR BABIES.  WHY.

Don’t try to put logic into this.  I KNOW that formal wear is required for like.. weddings, church n shit.  but LOOK AT THE PHOTo.  LOOK AT THE TinY FULL OUTFIT.  IT”sSO FUNNY tO me.

they’re for lITTLE BABY BUSINESS PEOPLE OMFG

V begged for me to add these. I’m so sorry.

"susan, rechedule my 9 o’clock meeting. I just shit my pants."

"Johnny, find out what this peek-a-boo asshole wants. He keeps kidnapping my family and giving them back"

"JERRY. I JUST TOOK A NAP. AND I’M STILL TIRED OF YOUR SHIT."

"LOOK. JOHNSON. PULL THIS OFF, AND YOU’LL BE DRIVING A NEW POWER WHEELS BY NEXT WEEK."

"Don’t try to bullshit me Johnson, I wasn’t born yesterday. I was born four months ago."

"Man, you should see me secretary’s rack. Lunch for DAYS."

"Alright mark, let’s talk numbers. But keep in mine that I can only count to five."

"TELL IAN I’M NOT SIGNING THE AGREEMENT UNTIL HE GIVES ME MY NOSE BACK"

"SUSAN. I’M MEETING THE CEO AT THE AIRPORT. CALL FOR MY TRICYCLE"

"JOHNSON GET IN HERE. I CAN’T EAT THIS WITHOUT THE PLANE SOUND."

"WE NEED TO MEET OUR PUKE QUOTA"

"MOMMY ISN’T STRESSED ENOUGH AND WE’RE HITTING OUR DEADLINE"

"AIDEN. AIDEN. LISTEN TO ME. GIVE ME THE JUICE"

"CLARISEE YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND. I NEED THIS PACIFIER"

"DAMMIT JIMMY I NEED THAT PLAYDATE FOR TOMORROW’

I am

legit in fucking

tears

baby business people ahahahahah

hmasfatty

Yes. This is everything I love.

I need at least 5 of these for my little baby boy now. Got a proper laugh out of the jokes but the suits are so cute too.

youdontlooklikeafeminist:

zmyaro:

To any Tumblrites who are deaf, hard of hearing, know people who are, or just enjoy cool tech, a start-up called MotionSavvy is working on technology that uses Leap Motion to recognize sign language and and outputs written or spoken English.  The project was started by a group of deaf students at RIT’s National Technical Institute for the Deaf (yay RIT!) who moved to San Francisco to develop the product with Leap.

The team has over 800 deaf beta testers, but they are looking for more.  They hope to have a product available to consumers by September of 2015.

For more information, check out this TechCrunch article and this video.

Boost to any of my hard of hearing followers - wanna try something that seems pretty neat?

(via femmeaesthetic)

chubbycartwheels:

diamondpistols:



Adam Selman’s 20-person team gluing 230,000 Swarovski crystals on Rihanna’s CFDA gown x


But you know, bear in mind that no one could figure out how to make a dress for Melissa McCarthy to go to the Oscars in.

Bolded because seriously.

chubbycartwheels:

diamondpistols:

Adam Selman’s 20-person team gluing 230,000 Swarovski crystals on Rihanna’s CFDA gown x

But you know, bear in mind that no one could figure out how to make a dress for Melissa McCarthy to go to the Oscars in.

Bolded because seriously.

(via pardonmewhileipanic)

Reblog this if you are a cis woman who would defend a trans woman if you saw her being harassed in a public restroom or would accompany her to the restroom so that she could feel safe

sharknadorade:

Because I really need to know how many people would

(via bellieyellie)

Reblog if it’s okay to befriend you, ask questions, ask for advice, rant, vent, let something off your chest, or just have a nice chat.

(via elizabum)

erinaree:

welookoutuponthesea:

ofcityromance:

malakhgabriel:

girlwhocriedsupernova:

blessedharlot:

bigenderjanecrocker:

jellyfishery:

Step 1: Take the Political Compass Test
Step 2: Reblog with
which political box your result falls in
what you consider your political beliefs to be
Step 3:???
Step 4: Profit!


Anarcho-communism, but verrrry close to that corner where a-socialism and a-collectivism meet it. I guessed I’d be in one of the three.
This test is pretty interesting, but to give accurate answers I need a “not applicable/yes but/no but” answer option. Like, what are anticapitalists supposed to do with “a truly free market needs xyz”? I don’t agree or disagree, I just don’t want that sentence to exist in the first place.

Haha, I’m right in the middle of anarcho-socialism. Not surprised we’re similar. I did assume I’d be in one of those lower-left three.

I’m in the top left corner of Anarcho-Collectivism. Seems about right.
I find it hilarious that in their famous people charts, no-one falls into the anti-authoritarian portion of the chart. And that Obama and Romney are just a hair’s breadth from one another.

anarchosocialist in the house. no surprises here. wonder what Dave will get? my guess is that bottom left quadrant but not as deep in it as me!

Im right in-between anarcho-communism and anarcho-socialism. I actually consider myself an anarcho-syndaclist. 

I’m right in the bottom right corner of democratic socialism. That’s probably fairly accurate, although I also strongly identify with libertarian socialism.
I agree with the above poster who says that they needed an ‘agree but’ or ‘disagree but’ option. Some of my answers were definitely qualified, but I wasn’t prepared to go the other way.

I ended up straddling anarcho-communism and anarcho-socialism which isn&#8217;t overly surprising to me but does make me feel I should read up on the two a little more. I echo a lot of other people here that there needed to be a neutral/non applicable option. There were a few questions where I wish I had been able to use such an option.

erinaree:

welookoutuponthesea:

ofcityromance:

malakhgabriel:

girlwhocriedsupernova:

blessedharlot:

bigenderjanecrocker:


jellyfishery
:

Step 1: Take the Political Compass Test

Step 2: Reblog with

  • which political box your result falls in
  • what you consider your political beliefs to be

Step 3:???

Step 4: Profit!

Anarcho-communism, but verrrry close to that corner where a-socialism and a-collectivism meet it. I guessed I’d be in one of the three.

This test is pretty interesting, but to give accurate answers I need a “not applicable/yes but/no but” answer option. Like, what are anticapitalists supposed to do with “a truly free market needs xyz”? I don’t agree or disagree, I just don’t want that sentence to exist in the first place.

Haha, I’m right in the middle of anarcho-socialism. Not surprised we’re similar. I did assume I’d be in one of those lower-left three.

I’m in the top left corner of Anarcho-Collectivism. Seems about right.

I find it hilarious that in their famous people charts, no-one falls into the anti-authoritarian portion of the chart. And that Obama and Romney are just a hair’s breadth from one another.

anarchosocialist in the house. no surprises here. wonder what Dave will get? my guess is that bottom left quadrant but not as deep in it as me!

Im right in-between anarcho-communism and anarcho-socialism. I actually consider myself an anarcho-syndaclist. 

I’m right in the bottom right corner of democratic socialism. That’s probably fairly accurate, although I also strongly identify with libertarian socialism.

I agree with the above poster who says that they needed an ‘agree but’ or ‘disagree but’ option. Some of my answers were definitely qualified, but I wasn’t prepared to go the other way.

I ended up straddling anarcho-communism and anarcho-socialism which isn’t overly surprising to me but does make me feel I should read up on the two a little more. I echo a lot of other people here that there needed to be a neutral/non applicable option. There were a few questions where I wish I had been able to use such an option.

Stop calling the UCSB shooter a madman. He was not insane. He was just a misogynistic boy filled with narcissistic rage. That’s all it takes. That and a fucking gun.

(via chubby-bunnies)

x0202:

it’s also interesting that mental illness is distinguished as the common factor within these crimes when there has yet to be any consistent, notable pattern of mentally ill women murdering men for not being interested in them

(via murphmanfa)

21. Feminist. Bisexual. Anxious. Loves cats and food. Hates paying bills and being a responsible adult.

twitter.com/Jigglykitty

view archive



Questions & Stuff